patrickz.aiLet’s talk ↗

Work & business / Project lab

Build a workplace AI training playbook

Create a lesson with a worked example, a practice prompt and a review rubric.

About 60 minutesSome experienceRead free · No sign-up

Before you start

A chat assistant, a familiar work task and a fictional source brief.

Why this lesson exists

This lab adapts the “Build an AI Training Playbook for Real Estate” project write-up into a practice build. The time is an estimated first session, not a promise to finish a production system. Use the public repository as a reference when available; the exercise can be built with original sample content.

Do the exercise

  1. Define the practice version

    Pick one outcome, such as drafting a factual description. Show weak and improved prompts, then ask the learner to check the output against the brief.

  2. Build step 1

    Pick one job outcome, such as writing a listing description.

  3. Build step 2

    Teach a reusable prompt formula.

  4. Build step 3

    Show a bad input, improved input, and reviewed output.

  5. Build step 4

    Add a compliance checklist beside the exercise.

  6. Build step 5

    Store prompts as structured data with categories and tags.

  7. Build step 6

    Add search and one-click copying.

  8. Run the experiment

    Give a colleague a new fictional example. Observe whether they can adapt the prompt and catch an intentionally unsupported claim without help.

A prompt to adapt

Replace the bracketed parts with your own practice details.

Work in a disposable practice project. Explain any setup requirements before changing files. Build one small step at a time and show how I can check it.

Create a beginner lesson that teaches a real-estate agent to draft property marketing with AI. Include learning objective, five-minute explanation, worked example, copyable prompt, review checklist, Fair Housing caution, and practice assignment.

Review this property description for unsupported claims, protected-class implications, neighborhood stereotyping, invented amenities, ambiguous pricing, and language that should be verified before publication.

My first-version boundary: Pick one outcome, such as drafting a factual description. Show weak and improved prompts, then ask the learner to check the output against the brief.

Run this experiment

Give a colleague a new fictional example. Observe whether they can adapt the prompt and catch an intentionally unsupported claim without help.

Check your result

Use evidence from your output. A confident explanation from the AI is not enough.

  • The learner produces a concrete artifact.
  • The exercise has an answer key or review criteria.
  • Industry-specific claims receive the appropriate human review.

If it isn’t working

Do not teach a prompt as a compliance guarantee. If the task involves regulated advertising, use current authoritative guidance and a qualified reviewer.

Where this came from

Public project repository ↗. The practice lesson is an adaptation, not a verbatim transcript. About the sources.

Prepared September 2026. Tools and interfaces change; use current official setup instructions. Session lengths are estimates.

KEEP GOING

Your next useful step

Browse all 59 guides ↗